America’s Cup: The powerhouse that is team New Zealand


For the boat lovers and sailing-nuts, there is no greater stage than the America’s Cup. Its roots go as far back as the 1800s, making it one of the oldest international sports competitions in the world. This year, the 35th America’s Cup will be held in Bermuda, a small British Overseas Territory in the Atlantic and a major offshore financial center. The defending champion, Oracle Team USA, will be challenged by five other teams, namely Artemis Racing, Emirates Team New Zealand, Groupama Team France, Land Rover BAR, and Softbank Team Japan. The clear favorite to win this year’s trophy is of course, the Oracle, but they can’t relax just yet for the Kiwis are just right behind their heels.


Image source:


It’s no secret that Auckland-based Emirates Team New Zealand are sailing on a tight budget. Despite their constraints, spectators and fans are still excited for them due to the fact that their team is brimming with talent and creative thinkers. According to Ken Read, a former America’s Cup helmsman, Peter Burling and his crew are the definite mystery boat at this stage in the race. They have proven time and time again that their competitive skills are on a higher level than the other teams. Their edge from the other teams come from their ability to think outside the box.


Image source:


Back in 2013, they were the first ever team to get their catamaran to hydrofoil ahead. However, Oracle won that one because of their excellent maneuvering skills upwind and downwind. This year, they upgraded once again. Instead of the usual arm-powered pedestals, four stationary bike-grinding stations will be used. This year’s battle will most definitely be entertaining.

Emirates Team New Zealand is a household name in their home country and has already triumphed over the America’s Cup twice, in 1995 and 2000. This year, they are extremely determined to bag a third glorious win.

Tent-pole features: The most expensive films of all time

The highest grossing films are usually also among the most expensive. But while James Cameron’s epic sci-fi film ‘Avatar’ is considered the most profitable of all time, it was not the costliest to make. Today’s box office charts have been largely dominated by 21st-century big-budget adventure films that required a nine-digit production budget and months of filming before they were officially released to cinemas. In fact, on production costs alone (excluding marketing expenses), only seven of the world’s 50 biggest earning blockbusters are cheaper than $100 million and they are all animated features. When ranked based on inflation-adjusted prices, however, a few films from the older decades made the cut.


Image source:


1. Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End

Year released: 2007

Budget: $341 million

At nearly three hours long, At World’s End is the third installment of the Disney swashbuckler saga that made Johnny Depp even more popular. Most of the production budget went to its cutting edge special effects as well as its actors’ whopping talent fees. It was praised for its performances, musical score, action scenes, and ambitious visuals.


2. Cleopatra

Year released: 1963

Budget: $340 million

This 1963 film underwent several casting and directorial changes, had to rebuild new sets, forced to move to a new location, and suffered many other filming problems. In the end, its total overheads ballooned to more than $31 million (from an original budget of just around $2 million)—a massive amount at the time and almost bankrupted 20th Century Fox. Total theatrical earnings reached $57 million but it was not enough to turn a profit.


3. Titanic

Year released: 1997

Budget: $294 million

Highly controversial and having received criticisms even before it was released, Titanic managed to silence critics and eventually became the first film to break into the $1 billion mark and won 11 Academy awards. It was the most expensive film made at that time, and is considered to be the most iconic movie about shipwrecks.


Image source:


4. Spider-Man 3

Year released: 2007

Budget: $291 million

The most expensive superhero movie ever, Spider-Man 3 is noted for having created more than 900 visual effects shots during post-production. Filming lasted for more than 100 days and had four different versions of the resolution of Sandman’s (the main antagonist) story.


5. Tangled

Year released: 2010

Budget: $281 million

It is rare for an animated film to receive extremely high production budget, but as in the case of Walt Disney’s adaptation of ‘Rapunzel,’ it is not impossible at all. Six years in the making, the movie underwent a controversial name change and needed a significant amount of time to perfect the digital simulation of one of the story’s most important elements: Rapunzel’s hair.


6. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Year released: 2009

Budget: $276 million

Harry Potter is a global phenomenon and producing a high-budget film series out of the literary masterpiece was an easy decision considering its very strong box office potential. Of all the films in the series, Half-Blood Prince was the most expensive. It set the record for the biggest single-day worldwide gross and was nominated at the 82nd Academy Awards for the ‘Best Cinematography’ category.


Image source:


7. Waterworld

Year released: 1995

Budget: $271 million

This film’s futuristic setting was strongly lauded by critics and viewers alike. While it did manage to earn very well at the box office compared to other films released in the same year, it failed to recoup its gigantic budget. After factoring in home video sales and TV broadcast rights, however, Waterworld eventually made profits.


8. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest

Year released: 2006

Budget: $265 million

Disney is highly generous when they see that a film can be very lucrative. Shot back-to-back with ‘At World’s End,’ ‘Dead Man’s Chest’ was immediately developed following the success of the sequels’ predecessor. It eventually became the third film in history to surpass the $1 billion threshold.


9. Avatar

Year released: 2009

Budget: $261

Like his previous film, James Cameron intended to make his new film a high-budget one. His epic sci-fi film—featuring tall humanoid blue aliens—was more than a decade in the making. Avatar made extensive use of new motion capture filming techniques and is one of the first films to popularize 3D viewing. Its groundbreaking special effects are considered to be a cinematic and technological breakthrough. It is currently the highest grossing film of all time.


By most standards, the American film industry dominates in terms of both production costs and box office performance. No other country comes close in such criteria, although India and China (which are significantly much more populous) may claim to have higher admissions. With gross revenues from theatrical runs generally increasing every passing year (the $1 billion mark has already been surpassed 21 times in the past six years alone), film studios have gained more confidence in increasing their budgets and produce more ambitious motion pictures.

Why I Don’t Live in the House That I Own

My Dad used to tell me stories of how his father was a building contractor but the house in which they lived had walls that were half finished.  Meanwhile my Mom, whose mother was a dressmaker, rarely got any new clothes as a teenager because her mother was too busy sewing other girls’ dresses for a living.

I guess I’m kind of like that.

You see, I invest in real property.  I own the titles to a couple of houses and bought a few others which are currently self-liquidating.  But the irony here is I have always moved from one place to another, staying in other people’s houses – renting – for the past eight years.

Let me explain why I choose to do this.  My goal is to generate an income from the real property I own.  As long as I can keep my rent expense lower than the rent income I earn, then I will continue to rent.

Almost everybody wants to own a sprawling house with lush gardens and maybe even a pool.  I do.  But living in such a house is a big expense and can be a drain on the budget.  The more sprawling the property, the higher the real property tax – which is computed based on lot and floor area.  The posher the neighborhood, the higher the association dues.  When you live in a big house, you also need to spend big in order to maintain it in its original state.  You also spend more on heat, water and lighting utilities.  You pay higher fire and earthquake insurance. The list goes on.  And if you bought that on a loan, you also have to factor in the interest expense.

But take note – this only applies if you LIVE in that house.  However, if you can rent it out at a price higher than the costs related to it, then that house can actually be considered a business.  If it gives you a net cash inflow each month or each year after you pay off the amortization and all other incidental expenses, then you are making money.  And if you can realistically expect real property prices to increase in your area, then that house can also be considered an investment.  In summary, that house you would consider as an expense if you live in it, can actually turn into an investment that will generate both rental income and a gain on sale if you choose to rent it out.

Of course I want to eventually settle down in my own home in the future.  Not too sprawling, not too cramped.  Just right for sensible tastes.  I could actually do it now, at a quite reasonable cost.  But apart from cost, I have this one tiny problem. I still don’t know where I would actually like to settle down.  The homes I own are scattered over four localities and then I live in another town.  At the same time, for the past ten years, I have been trying to live as close as I can to my place of work in order to avoid traffic.  I’ve gotten used to taking my time in the morning, having a nice, leisurely breakfast before I walk to the office.  I’m not sure if I can give that up so soon. If only offices stayed put, I would buy a nearby condo unit to live in.  But my work has changed three times for the past eight years so I can’t be so sure of a location. I’m thinking once I have my own business or eventually retired to become a farmer, maybe then I can finally be sure of where I want to live.  For now, I have all these houses, but home is where the heart is.  And it keeps moving around all the time for me.

Last year, I met a newly married couple.  They had a tragedy a few years back when the house of the young woman’s mother was burned in a fire.  The young woman almost died in that fire.  Her health soon recovered but she continued to suffer severe emotional trauma.  The newly wed decided to sell their real property and travel instead. They would rent a house for a month or two, moving like Bedouins from one place to another, anywhere close to nature. One time they would live in the highlands, another time on a secluded island, then in a farm living off their organic produce, so on and so forth.  For this young couple, it was a way to heal their psyches.  Not being attached to a particular house or location was a liberating and soothing experience.

In contrast, I see how some of my grade school classmates, now with children of their own, still living in the same town we spent our childhood in.  I guess there’s a different kind of peace and stability in staying put as well, in establishing your roots.

Well, each to his own.  As for me, this is my gig for now.  I dream of settling down on my own home in the future.  To be able to afford that, I just need to invest and stay mobile for now.



Jim Rogers: Investment Insights and 2016 Outlook

There are but a few brilliant investment gurus today who actually prove their expertise with actual solid gains on their investment portfolios.  However, Jim Rogers is a class of his own.  He not only produced stellar gains by putting his money where his mouth is.  He has actually gone as far as relocating his home and his family from a western location to an Asian one because he believes that the US economy is inevitably bound to collapse and he sees the best growth prospects to be in China.  Rogers sold his New York Mansion for 16 million USD and transferred to Singapore in 2007, particularly so that his two daughters could learn to speak Mandarin. He believes that if it was a smart move to relocate to New York in 1907, it was also a smart move to relocate to Asia in 2007.Now if that’s not proof of conviction, I don’t know what is.

In 1970, Jim Rogers, then aged 28, worked in an investment bank together with George Soros.  Then in 1973, the two left the investment bank and co-founded their own hedge fund called Quantum Fund.  Quantum Fund put its money in international investments and was able to generate an astounding 4200% over ten years from 1970 to 1980. In contrast, the S&P gained only 47% for the same time period.  With his gains, Jim Rogers decided to retire and focused on managing his personal investments.  Now with more time in his hands, Jim Rogers motorcycled around the world, doing investment studies on each country he visited.

Jim Rogers has provided many investors a rich wellspring of investment insights, drawing from his many successes and experiences.  Unlike George Soros who finds it difficult to verbalize his investment processes, Jim Rogers is a wonderful communicator and has written a lot about his investment ideas.  More than just ideas, he actually acts on what he is convinced of and immerses himself in cultures and localities across the globe in his search for the best international investments.

Some of his famous investment insights include the following:

“Most successful investors…do nothing most of the time.”Rogers once mentioned that brokers don’t like him that much because he rarely trades and holds on to his investments for years.  Brokers only earn a commission when you buy or sell.  The individual investor can do well to take heed of this.  At times, some investors will be monitoring the markets on a day-to-day basis and actually be overtrading.  Overtrading leads to higher brokers’ fees and commission expenses which eat up investment capital. Focusing too much on the short term fluctuations can also cause unnecessary panic or stress and lead to an investor getting caught in whipsaws and bull traps.

“On Wall Street… there’s no truer adage than ‘markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent’” Rogers shorted a few companies in the 1970s and went broke because of his trades.  The prices of those companies did eventually crash in two to three years, but not after Rogers had to cover his shorts.  It was then that Rogers realized that you could be smart and still end up broke.  Investors must realize that the markets don’t always follow a rational path.  Fundamentally, market prices depend on how much people are willing to pay for something – and this in turn is affected by human psychology and perception – emotions of greed and fear – which more often than not are irrational.  Just relying on fundamentals, numbers and charts, an investor can predict a likely outcome.  But the market will not go on a straight path towards that outcome.  Without staying power, even Jim Rogers couldn’t wait for the markets to gain rationality.

As for his investment outlook, Jim Rogers still believes that the world economy as a whole is bound to get into bigger trouble this time. He says he is laying low in his investment activities for now as he foresees another global crisis to happen (instigated by the US’ unbridled spending and soaring debt).   He shorted junk bonds in 2015 and is still bullish on agriculture.  Despite his pessimistic outlook on the US economy, he is actually betting on the US dollar to increase in value in view of a global currency crisis he sees forthcoming.   According to Rogers, the world still currently views the US Dollar as safe haven and thus he holds a lot of US dollar investments. Rogers isn’t buying gold yet but believes there will be a buying opportunity in the next two years or so.